mercredi 29 novembre 2017

Controversy over alternative energy

Biomass power renewable energy

Biomass in ecology

  The definition of biomass in ecology is the mass of living organisms in a given area or ecosystem at a given time. Biomass can refer to one or more species biomass which is the weight of one species in the community or to the community biomass which is the mass of all the species in the community. Biomass can include plants (phytomass) and biomass (zoomass), and in our present case, it's the weight mass of organically bound carbon number in tonne present who will be considered for its energy potential.

It is estimated that:
  • the total live biomass on Earth apart from bacteria is about 560 billion tons of carbon 
  •  The world bacterial biomass was calculated to be 350-550 billion of tons of carbon, equal to 60%-100% of carbon in plants.
  • 95% of the biomass is in the continents
  • only 5-10 billion of tons of carbon are found in the oceans
  • on land, there's 1000 times more plant biomass than animal biomass 
  • 18% of all this plant biomass is eaten by animals on land
  • in the ocean, there's 30 times more animal biomass than plant biomass
  • most plant biomass on the ocean is eaten by animal's biomass 
  • the Earth's total annual production of the biomass it is estimated to be 100 billion tons of carbon a year. 


  Biomass power is the energy derived from vegetable or animal matter which can be harnessed to produce electricity. In the field of bio-energy, biomass is the part of it still usable as a source of energy; either directly by combustion or indirectly after methanation (biogas, or its uncluttered version bio-methane).     
  Wood is still the largest biomass energy source today. Natural wood logs are used on a large scale, this includes also branches, forest residues, dead trees, municipal wastes, etc... The largest source of energy from wood is pulping liquor or "black liquor" a waste product from processes of pulp, paper, and paperboard industry. It's used in the pulp mill's industry. They use recovery boilers to burn the black liquor to create and produce steam. Wood is considered an alternative energy source because it pollutes less than fossil fuel, and it is being considered a renewable energy source because plants crop can be replaced with new growth.
  Pellet fuels are made from organic compressed matter or biomass. Pellets are made from one of any five general categories of biomass: industrial waste and co-products, food wastes, agricultural residues, energy crops, and virgin lumber. Wood pellets are the most common fuel pellets, and they're made from compacted sawdust and related industrial wastes.

  Many crops are of interest for their ability to provide high yields of biomass, like sugarcane. Bagasse, its residue is produced in great quantities. The production of bagasse is evaluated at 250 million tons a year, it can serve to feed animals. It has a poor nutritive value and can be fermented by white-rot fungi to produce enriched animal feed. Bagasse and other sources such as cornstarch who are rich in sugar can be fermented to produce first-generation biofuels. Bio-ethanol is an alcohol that can serve directly in a fuel cell to produce electricity or as an additive to gasoline. But utilizing food-based resources for fuel production can only aggravate the food shortage problem. Second-generation biofuels, on the other hand, utilize non-food biomass products such as municipal and agriculture wastes. Despite being the favored alternative of production of bio-fuel,
second-generation biofuels isn't achieved yet due to technological issues. Energy derived from biomass is projected to be the largest non-hydroelectric renewable source of electricity in the U.S. between 2000 and 2020.

  Some biomass products like ethanol and wood have a poor calorific value, compared to the energy released by burning 1 tonne of oil equivalent 0,3215 (toe).
The tonne of oil equivalent (toe) is a unit of energy, it's approximately 42 gigajoules or 11 600 kWh. And a tonne of crude oil is approximately 7,3 barrels. 


The calorific value in comparison with crude oil: 

  • 2,2 tonnes of wood = 1 toe 
  • 1,5 tonnes of high-quality coal = 1 toe
  • 1 ton of uranium (in light water reactor) = 10000-16000 toe
  • 1100 m³ of natural gas = 1 toe 
  • 1 tonne of diesel = 1,01 toe
  • 1 tonne of bio-ethanol = 0,64 toe

  Electricity production comparison value:

  • geothermal electricity :              1MWh = 0,860 toe
  • nuclear electricity :                    1MWh = 0,261 toe
  • fossil or renewable electricity :    1MWh = 0,086 toe
  • Natural gas electricity :              1MWh = 0,077 toe

dimanche 26 novembre 2017

Solar power technologies pros and cons

Controversy over alternative energy  

The costs of solar energy(part 4)

  Photo-voltaic solar panels system on your households who produce electricity are photo-voltaic cells, connected together to a solar module, who transform solar radiation into electricity. Generally, several modules are grouped together to form an installation. They are usually installed on the roof so that the slope is sufficient for the snow to slide on the walls of glass and to better capture the brightness of the Sun.
   DC power generated from solar radiation is used to power a device or recharge a battery. The power must first go through an inverter before being converted to 110V and routed to the house. Generally, people are connected to the electricity grid and work with a battery, because they can get supplies from the electricity company if their needs are not met by solar energy. Off-network users use batteries that provide power, regardless of brightness and variations in demand. In eastern Northern-America, these batteries provide a stable diet during the shorter days of autumn and early winter.
   All that consumes electricity can be powered by photo-voltaic panels, namely lighting, appliances, computers, small electrical appliances. However, for anything that generates heat, such as heating the house and water, it is better to use another technology: solar thermal energy. Indeed, it is more efficient and less expensive to generate heat with this technology.
   By cons, the costs are very important if you have the idea of converting your single family house into solar energy. But the investment can be worth the cost, even in Quebec. In Quebec, it is estimated that electricity produced with photo- voltaic panels cost six times more than the price of residential electricity. A kWh produced with solar photo voltaic energy costs about $0.42 compared to the $0.07 per kWh requested by Hydro-Quebec.
   Even if Hydro-Quebec does not go to the residence or if the cost of connection to the network exceeds $15,000 to $20,000, it is advantageous to install solar panels. It all depends also on where you live, how much you pay for your electricity in kWh in your state or province. How much you spend on electricity each month and how much you think you'll be saving with your solar panels system each year...
   For example, the average annual electricity use for Canadian and U.S. households is 11,000-kilowatt hours (kWh). Multiply that by the national average electricity rate as of September 2016 ($0.1287 per kWh) and you'll find that the typical American family is spending over $1,400 a year on electricity alone.
   Then, you'll have to consider also the volatile nature of electricity prices, determine what utility rates will be in years to come. When you compare the cost of utility electricity with solar home, you should keep in mind that you can expect electricity rates to increase annually. Over the past decade, national electricity costs increased by 2.2% per year.

Average solar panels installation:

  • System size: 5 kilowatts (the national average)
  • Electricity demand: 11,000kilowatts-hour per year (national average)
  • Utility rate inflation: 2,2%
  • Percent needs meeting by solar panels: 84%
  • Electricity rate
  • Ownership of the solar panels is assumed

The annual solar energy production of solar systems:

  • 3kW                    4,260 kWh
  • 4kW                    5,680 kWh
  • 5kW                    7,100 kWh
  • 7kW                    9,949 kWh
  • 8kW                   11,360 kWh
  • 10kW                 14,200 kWh
  • 12kW                 17,040 kWh
  • 15kW                 21,300 kWh

Cost of electricity in kilowatt per hour:

  • Quebec:           7 cents kWh
  • Toronto:         14 cents kWh
  • Moncton:        12 cents kWh
  • Chicago:         17 cents kWh
  • New-York:      29 cents kWh
  • Boston:           30 cents kWh

So, if you live in a place like the province of Quebec, it'll take you as 4 times longer to get your return of investment on your solar panels system compare with how much you pay for your electricity bills in Boston, Massachusetts or in New-York.

Examples of costs for equipment (installation included)

Prices are approximate

Example 1

Medium sized family households
Not connected to the utility grid's

24 panels = 2,880 watts / $15,000
12 batteries / $6,000
Other equipment / $7,000
Total: $28,000

Example 2

Chalet, weekend use
Not connected to the utility grid's

8 panels = 960 watts / $5,000
6 batteries / $3,000
Other equipment / $4,000
Total: $12,000

Example 3

Small hunting & fishing hut, RV
Not connected to the utility grid's

2 panels = 240 watts / $1,250
2 batteries of 12 volts / $400
Other equipment / $550
Total: $2,200

Solar power technologies pros and cons

Need to structure solar energy technologies. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Solar power technologies pros and cons

Controversy over alternative energy  (part 3)

Solar and renewable energy, Chinese business

  The Sun is at the origin of most of all the energy sources on Earth except for nuclear energy and deep geothermal energy. Solar energy comes from nuclear fusion at the centre of the Sun, the energy spreads in the Solar system and the Universe in the form of an electromagnetic radiation, photons, and infrared radiation. A fraction of the electromagnetic energy from the Sun is coming true the atmosphere, which absorb a part of it and reach the surface of the Earth.
  The conversion of light in electricity called photo-voltaic effect was discovered by the French physicist Edmond Becquerel in 1839, but we'll have to wait a hundred years before scientists deepen and exploit this phenomenon of physics. It's the space exploration and NASA that will really make solar energy progress. The space industry will invest a lot of funds in the development of solar panels. Solar panels are the only non-nuclear way of powering satellites with energy, moreover, solar energy is a constant source of energy in orbit. 

  While President Trump promises to put American coal miners back to work, China is moving the opposite direction. China's betting big on renewable energy. It commits in January to invest $367 billion in renewable power generation: solar, wind, hydro and nuclear by 2020. The investment will create 10 million jobs in the sector. Beijing is investing hundreds of billions of dollars and creating millions of jobs in clean power. China currently boasts 3,5 million jobs in clean energy, by far the most in the world, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency. 
  China has built vast solar and wind farms, helping fuel the growth of major industries that sell their products around the world. It's 2,5 million people working in the solar power sector alone in China, compared with 260,000 people in the U.S. China produce 63% of the world production of solar photostatic (PV) and it has emerged as the world's largest manufacturer of 2015. Solar power in the People's Republic of China is one of the biggest industries in China. Chinese solar panels production reportedly quadrupled between 2009 and 2011 to surpass the entire global demand. The flood of Chinese panels was one of the reasons why world prize crashed by 80% between 2008 and 2013. As a result, The United States and EU accused China of dumping its solar panels in Europe at below the cost-prizes. 
  The country has become a major manufacturer and exporter of renewable energy technology, supplying two-thirds of the world's solar panels. China has also a strong grip on wind power. It produces nearly half of the world's wind turbines at a rate of about two every hour.
There are two large families of short-cycle solar energy to distinguish:
  • thermal solar energy, the use of radiation heat of the Sun and also CSP concentrating solar power system by using mirrors or lenses of a large area into small a small one
  • PV photo-voltaic energy, the use of radiation itself to produce electricity
 Solar energy received at a point of the globe depends on:
  • solar energy sent by the Sun and arriving in the immediate vicinity of the Earth (decadal, seasonal, and punctual fluctuations of the Sun)
  • cloudiness (clouds, fog, etc.) which varies enormously from one place to another
  • latitude, season, and time, which affect the height of the Sun and therefore on the energy received per unit area, as well as on cloudiness as a function of the local climate
 As a renewable energy source, the part of the world finale consumption's production of electricity of photo-voltaic solar panels was estimated to be 1,2% in 2015. Solar energy from solar panels has multiples advantages: it's a renewable and inexhaustible energy source because it's coming from the rays of the Sun. It's a clean energy source because its respects nature and the environment. It's reliable, installation is easy to use, the cost of operation is low and maintenance is reduced.

jeudi 23 novembre 2017

Solar energy advantages and disadvantages

Solar power technologies pros and cons

Controversy over alternative energy  (part 2)

Voltaic cells production 

   From an electric point of view, a photo-voltaic cell is the equivalent of a power generator to which a diode has been added. In a photo-voltaic cell, a semiconductor is exposed to the light, a photon with a sufficient energy pulls off an electron from the matrix of the semiconductor, creating a hole. The principle of the voltaic cell is to force the electrons and the holes to go toward the opposite side of the material and created a difference of potential, a voltage in between the two faces like in a battery.
   A semiconductor is generally made of silicon because of its properties, cheap price and its abundance in nature. In the semiconductor's production, the introduction of small impurities into the intrinsic semiconductor is made for the purpose of modulating its electrical properties. The dope material is referred to as extrinsic semiconductor.
  In the superior layer of a semiconductor doped N voltaic cell exists a larger quantity of free electrons compared to the intrinsic material (non-doped), hence the name superconductor doping N, for electron negative. The doping N production consisted of increasing the density of electrons in the semiconductor. The atoms or the elements needed generally have 5 valence electrons to participate in the chemical bond, and they are usually in the IV column of the periodic table chart: P, As, Sb, are commonly used in the production… Those atoms embedded in the crystal lattice will present 4 covalent bonds and a free electron. This electron who's weakly bound to the atom can easily be excited toward the conductive band. When the doping N is sufficient, the number of electrons surpass by far the number of holes, and they become majority carriers. 
   The doped P semiconductors production consists of creating a deficit of electrons and to increase the density of holes in the matrix. And then the semiconductor will be considered positively charged, hence its name superconductor doped P for positive charge. To do this, we include a certain number of atoms low in electrons in the semiconductor. For silicon semiconductors, trivalent atoms will be embedded in the intrinsic (pure) matrix and it is boron atoms that are used most often in the fabrication of the P semiconductors. This atom: boron with his 3 valence electrons can only produce 3 covalent bonds with his 4 neighbours, creating holes in the structure. Holes who will be filled with electrons from silicon neighbours; thus displacing the holes. When the doping P is sufficient, holes surpass by far the number of electrons, and holes become majority carriers.

mercredi 22 novembre 2017

Hydroelectricity pros and cons

Hydroelectricity pros and cons

Controversy over alternative energy  (part 1)

  Hydroelectricity is a good alternative energy source to fossil fuel (wood, coal, natural gas, and oil) for the environment. Hydro-power produces a 100 times fewer greenhouse gases than coal-fired power plants. It's called hydroelectricity and it's the most popular clean energy source in the world and it counts for 16% of the world's production, but well behind fuel fossil energy production. It's an affordable energy source and it's easy to stock electricity, compared to solar panels or wind power turbines. Those technologies need batteries to stock electricity, hydroelectricity not, it's a water reservoir and you just open the van when you need to have electricity. It's a renewable energy source as long as you have the water supply. 

Hydroelectricity and evaporation water supply

  One of the major problems of hydroelectric water retaining dams in hot countries like Egypt and Namibia in Africa is the stagnation of water and its evaporation. In Egypt 10 cubic kilometers of water is lost to evaporation each year: that's 12% to 18% of the Nil water. The champion in Africa is in Namibia whose one of its dams dispense 14 millions cubic kilometers of water and loose 45 millions cubic of water each year due to evaporation, no question it's for sure more than its production of electricity. 
  Hydro-power Greenhouse gases debate Some say hydro-power doesn't emit carbon dioxide or just a few. At Hydro-Quebec their numbers say that it's a clean energy source and it produces the same quantity of green-gases in kWh than wind power turbines and 4 times less than solar panels technology at their fabrication. In fact in 2009 in Quebec, thanks to hydro-power, the electricity sector accounts for only 0,6% of GHG emissions. The transportation sector accounts for the most with 44%.  
   But others say the opposite, hydro-power plants are emitting GHG indirectly. Their point is that when they have built the hydro dams they usually completely flood large areas of lands, full of trees, biomass and other variety of organic stuff. After the flood, the soil organic vegetation and sediments start to decompose, rut and emit methane. This decomposition produces methane which is at least 34 times more potent as other greenhouse gases. Some experts say that hydroelectricity contributes to 4% of greenhouse gases pollution emitted every year in the world. It's also said that hydroelectricity pollutes more than the aviation industry on this planet.
Hydroelectricity and the environmental impact

Hydroelectricity is also linked to disrupting aquatic ecosystems. It interferes with aquatic life and results in huge scale devastation. With that, also it leads to water stagnation. Stagnant water is when water stops to flow and it can be a major environmental hazard, a breeding ground for mosquitoes and parasites, an incubator for many kinds of bacteria and diseases and illnesses like malaria and dengue fever in hot countries where the temperature is ideal for it. Hydro-power plant dams are usually built across rivers to stock large bodies of water in a basin. The water loses is good proprieties, lose oxygen, sediments start to build, water stagnated and that's very bad for the ecosystems and the environment. It had been found that a lot of individuals, fishes, and others aquatic animals will perish in there by the lack of oxygen and impossibility to reproduce in their native habitats. There is a huge probability also that the fish and other aquatic creatures will find a way into the penstock pipes then to the turbines and get exterminated.

Renewable energy debate

Hydroelectricity may not be the perfect alternative energy source and the answer to all of our environmental problems. If greenhouse gases are our big concern and the control of global warming our first priority today, hydroelectricity is maybe not the final solution for to save the environment and the planet.

lundi 20 novembre 2017

Controversy over alternative energies

  Controversy over alternative energy


    Nothing is easy and simple here. We will always be confronted with difficulties and problems with the environment every time we try to make use of many forms of energies just for trying to make our life a bit easier.
  The resulting way we calculate, and we use energy for driving our fuel gas vehicles to work, for cooking or for heating our house will not necessarily be in terms the best for us and for the environment. 
  Problems will rise, and they are part of the equation. With new technologies, we cannot escape our responsibility when we face environmental problems. With respect to nature, we must preserve the Earth, our flora, and fauna, because it's important for our survival. By the fact, we want to stay in a clean place, with breathable air and eat healthy food; it's where we want to be.
  Nature is an entropy, in chaos you may say, but with the Sun it's our Universe. The Earth here around is a unique place and it's like nowhere else with ecosystems whose life takes place and gets created like by magic. It's where every part of it is important. You'll find also by the fact that you are not God, and you can't replicate or create life on Earth and you better take care of it.
  I would like to talk about laws of physic to try to make you understand who we are and where we live. A good definition of Earth and the thermodynamic laws that govern it is very important for our comprehension. Our place the Earth with the Sun is a closed system in equilibrium. Our Sun has created a thermodynamic machine on Earth. The particle's entropy is at the maximum in a physical static environment with temperature, pressure, and other parameters very well-defined. The Earth is by definition obeying the laws of physic and it cannot be violated.
  When we're referring to alternative energies we are talking about an alternative energy to a previous form of energy like fossil fuel, wood, even whale oil, and nuclear. And that, for the biggest part we would prefer an alternative source of energy to the fossil fuel responsible for the poisonous greenhouse gases, health diseases, and global warming. It could be also an alternative to the scarcity of wood and the destruction of forests and the preservation of nature. It could be also that we would like to get rid of the danger of the nuclear and its nuclear wastes. All of this has many objectives and many goals like saving the trees or just to clean up the atmosphere for world health problem issues.
  When we think of alternative energies, renewable energies or clean energies, we may think of them as perfect alternative solutions to fossil fuel, but it's not the case. Even those technologies have many direct and indirect effects on the environment. Some pollute also, some make noises, and they are not by far magic solutions that will solve all our problems.

samedi 18 novembre 2017

La Bagasse

La Bagasse

La bagasse est le résidu fibreux de la canne à sucre qu'on a passée par le moulin pour en extraire le suc. Elle est composée principalement par la cellulose de la plante.
Ce terme désigne également les tiges de la plante qui fournit l'indigo, quand on les retire de la cuve après la fermentation.

Mode de production

Production de sucre
Production de sucre de canne à Madère
Production de sucre de canne à Madère
L'industrie de la canne produit en grandes quantités la bagasse, résidu de l'extraction du jus de pipe pour la production de rhum ou de sucre. On estime que la production mondiale de bagasse est d'environ 250 millions de tonnes par an.

Utilisation de la bagasse

Production d'énergie

On considère qu'une tonne de canne produit environ 300 kg de bagasse qui a une valeur calorifique de 7 900 kJ/kg ce qui est certes inférieur à celle du bois sec (16 000 kJ/kg) dont le rythme de production est cependant plus lent.
La bagasse est une bioénergie utilisée dans les usines de production de rhum ou de sucre. La performance des installations permet à certaines usines de fonctionner en autonomie énergétique.
En comparaison avec les énergies fossiles brûlées dans les usines de production d'énergie, la bagasse présente plusieurs intérêts : elle est dépourvue de dioxyde de soufre, elle résulte d'une autre production, et sa combustion ne dégage que le CO2 fixé par la plante lors de sa croissance, quantité très réduite car le CO2 consommé par le métabolisme autotrophe de la canne à sucre est pour la majeure partie stocké dans le sucre.
Une exploitation rationnelle des 250 millions de tonnes de bagasse produites annuellement dans le monde pourrait économiser 50 millions de tonnes de pétrole soit environ 1,2 % de la consommation annuelle en 2003.
Cette utilisation concerne environ 60 % de la bagasse produite d'après la FAO1.

Alimentation du bétail

La bagasse peut être également utilisée pour l'alimentation du bétail. Cette utilisation ne semble pas intéressante dans le cas de jeunes bovins mais s'avère rentable pour les animaux de plus de deux ans1.

Construction et ameublement

La bagasse permet de fabriquer un matériau de construction appelé bagapan.

Emballage alimentaire

La bagasse est utilisée depuis quelques années pour les emballages alimentaires, assiettes, bols, gobelets, etc. En effet, cette utilisation de la bagasse est une bonne alternative au plastique et au polystyrène, car la bagasse n'est pas dangereuse pour la santé, et elle est biodégradable en 45 jours2. L'avantage également de la bagasse est sa résistance à des températures extrêmes, et elle peut donc être congelée ou servir de contenant pour bouillir les aliments. Ne contenant pas de métaux, un produit en bagasse est utilisable au four à micro-ondes. Les emballages alimentaires en bagasse sont compostables. L'utilisation d'un tel produit aurait un impact neutre sur la santé voire positif sur l'environnement3.

mercredi 15 novembre 2017

Rocket Stove mass heater

Rocket stove mass heater

1/10 the consumption rate for the same effective heating to your living space

Details on Rocket mass heaters    
   Rocket stoves are a type of fuel-efficient device, named in the 70s, but dating back millennia in concept.  A super-hot chimney above the fire draws the flames sideways and up, blending hot fuel and air into a quick, hot, clean-burning fire that takes little wood, leaves little residue, and has lots of uses.
  • Rocket heating stove heats up your home with 80% to 90% less wood, exhaust is nearly pure steam and CO2 (a little smoke at the beginning) 
  • the heat from one fire can last for days you can build one in a day or two
  • folks have built them spending less than $20
  • less CO2 than natural gas or electric heat
  • if you buy the wood, it costs less to operate than natural gas
  • Virtually no smoke or carbon monoxide byproducts, just carbon dioxide, and steam
  • Very little ash buildup with easy clean-out
  • Vertical wood inlet to a small firebox
  • Horizontal burn chamber
  • Insulated internal flue or riser
  • A drum or barrel over the riser for gases to cool and give off heat
  • An exhaust at the bottom that often extends through a cob bench to slowly store & release heat
   The average wood stove sends 80% or more of the heat created by the fire up the chimney flue and out, giving off only leftover radiant and convection heat transferred to the body of the stove and into the room.
   A Rocket stove, by contrast, is able to scavenge almost all of that previously wasted exhaust heat without the buildup of creosote or other deposits.
Rocket mass heater's plan

  A quick video| how a rocket mass heater works
Chimney through in mass
"The Rocket Mass Heater takes this useful, clean-burning heat, adds a self-wood burning box, and channels the exhaust through a masonry block to store a touchable warmth for hours or days. (Masonry heat storage is also seen in Roman hypocausts, Chinese 'Kang'stoves,  European masonry heaters, and ancient masonry dwellingand hearths)."
  •     This could be the cleanest and most sustainable way to heat a conventional home. Some people have reported that they heat their home with nothing more than the dead branches that fall off the trees in their yard. 
  • A regular wood stove will extract heat immediately. A rocket mass heater will direct the fire through an insulated space to make the fire burn much hotter before harvesting the heat. This burns the smoke and creosote. Then most of the heat is extracted and put into the room. Any remaining heat is pushed through a mass to be slowly released over the next couple of days.
  • Smoke is wasted fuel.  It's also poisonous.  Good mixing, high-temperature combustion, and the right balance of draft and drag create a clean-burning, efficient stove.  Efficient stoves use less wood, as well as promoting healthy air for everyone in the neighborhood.
  • The smoke coming from a chimney of a regular wood stove is typically 300 to 600 degrees and a large volume - and typically stinks up the neighborhood. The exhaust from a rocket mass heater is typically 70 to 120 degrees and a small volume - and is usually clear and without odor.
How much it cost to run?  "We've heard from a lot of people that they heat their home with the sticks that naturally fall off the trees in their yard, so, for them it costs nothing. We have one story of a guy that heated his home all year with junk mail. If you choose to buy wood and have it delivered, the cost is usually about $200 per cord (about a mounded pickup load). We have a lot of people that are heating their home with about a half cord of wood per year. But depending on how cold it is where you are, how insulated your home is, how big your home is ... maybe you will need as much as two cords per year."
Beautiful rocket mass heaters

For more information:


lundi 13 novembre 2017

Run your car on water controversy

Run your car on water controversy   

                      Free energy conspiracy theory   

   A water-fuelled car is an automobile that hypothetically derives directly its energy from water. They're claiming: "This water hybrid system essentially converts your
Learn secret to run your car on water
Run your car on water
vehicle to use water as a source of supplemental or even (theoretically) primary fuel". 
   But in fact, water is a fully oxidized hydrogen. Hydrogen itself is a high-energy, flammable substance, but its useful energy is released when water is formed. Water will not burn. "The engine derives fuel from hydrogen and oxygen, generated by the electrolysis of water." 
   The process of electrolysis can split water into hydrogen and oxygen, but it takes as much energy to take apart a water molecule as was released when the hydrogen was oxidized to form water. This system to work we will have to inject energy into it more than it would create and violate first or second thermodynamic law of physic on the water electrolysis. 
   They claim also:"Although petroleum-derived fuel and an external electrical generating system are not theoretically required, in most circumstances it is a practical necessity. The only byproduct resulting from the hydrogen and oxygen
Fuel cell
Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell
components of combustion within the engine is water vapour. Therefore, emissions are usually cleaner, emitting fewer polluting particles. In short, the Water‐hybrid system is a “cleaner” system; one that derives supplemental fuel from a free and inexhaustible resource; water"! 
   The thing is, if you put a lot of water in your engine, corrosion will rapidly form, corrode and destroy your engine.
   "The water‐hybrid system is not a perpetual motion machine. It is a high efficiency, water-fueled, electro‐
Scams, hackers
Hacker scam artist
mechanical system capable of producing hydrogen and oxygen in sufficient quantity to improve the overall fuel‐efficiency of internal combustion engines. Vehicles powered by the water‐hybrid system are inherently safer than hydrogen-powered vehicles which require hydrogen tanks. Instead of hydrogen tanks, the water hybrid system extracts combustible hydrogen as needed from the water, and this steady release of hydrogen is burned continuously, thereby preventing larger accumulations of hydrogen gas". 
  This is called, in fact, in my view, a new energy suppression conspiracy theory scam that technologically viable, pollution free, no-cost energy source are been suppressed by the government, corporations or advocacy groups. Generally unproven, low-cost energy sources. Wikipedia.
    "The water‐hybrid system is called a conversion system because it doesn’t require removal, modification, or disabling any of your vehicles’ existing systems. Therefore, it allows you to run your vehicle on either 100% gas systems or the
Fuel cell
 Allen Meyer (August 24, 1940 – March 20, 1998)
water‐hybrid system. In the unlikely event that your Water‐hybrid fails, you can easily switch back to solely using gasoline power." 
   This is called a fraud a lie. This engine relies on the use of two devices: one device containing water (non-useful) and a device using fuel, said to initiate the reaction. It's the fuel device that provides all the energy. Generally, the demonstration is very short, which makes it impossible to measure the real consumption of fuel or to note an apparently low consumption. Wikipedia.

   "But, you'll soon be getting your water-hybrid back into working order. Once you've driven by the water-hybrid system you'll never be happy with anything else! A vehicle powered by the water-hybrid system is theoretically capable of traveling from 50 to 300 miles on each gallon of supplemental water while improving overall fuel efficiency up to 45%. However, as it is true for any engine, actual efficiency depends on many factors such as: driving habits, terrain, vehicle weight and shape, and ability to tweak and optimize the system." 

   Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be scientific and factual in the absence of evidence gathered and constrained by appropriate scientific methods.[1][Note 1] Pseudoscience is often characterized by the following: contradictory, exaggerated or falsifiable claims; reliance on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; and absence of systematic practices when developing theories. The term pseudoscience is often considered pejorative[4] because it suggests something is being presented as science inaccurately or even deceptively. Those described as practicing or advocating pseudoscience often dispute the characterization. (source) Wikipedia.

   "Yes, the  Water‐hybrid system can provide fuel from water for just about any home appliance requiring natural gas or propane as a source of heat; thereby saving valuable and diminishing natural resources. Space heaters and furnaces are excellent candidates.  Stoves and other cooking units such as barbecue grills can also be fueled.
by the water‐hybrid system. Such applications require a separate power supply to convert your homes 120 volt AC power into the 12 volt DC power required by the water‐hybrid system. You can purchase an inexpensive power supply at any
Car hacks
electronics store such as Radio Shack, or have someone familiar with electronics, build one for you since the design is very simple. The cost of home electricity used by the water‐hybrid system is insignificant, probably less than $3 per month in most cases. The water‐hybrid system is relatively easy to assemble and very easy to install, especially compared with other conversion plans on the market. No special tools are required. The usual tool and equipment found in a typical home workshop will do the job. 
Right now, this specific water‐hybrid system is not being commercially manufactured, but there are various distributors around the country who offer DIY (Do it yourself) parts or fully assembled kits utilizing similar technologies and principles Planning is in the initial stages for producing Water‐hybrid conversion kits for most vehicles and eventually manufacturing the entire system, or at least its major components. 

   Scammers use the following psychological engine to motivate their victims:
  • Gain appetite with saving in perspective;
  • Principle of rarity (demonstration in small committee, idea of exclusivity);
  • Lack of basic scientific knowledge; 
  • Administrative guarantees by the presence of certificates, patents, bailiffs...;
  • Interest in conspiracy theory and feeling of exclusion from society;
  • False figure of fuel consumption;